are sarms safe?

Are SARMs Safe? A Comprehensive Overview

ARMs hold considerable potential for muscle wasting diseases, osteoporosis, and other ailments because they can enhance muscle mass and bone density without the adverse side effects often seen with steroids. Moreover, they may also improve athletic performance by increasing muscle size and strength.

Lack of Regulatory Approval

Despite these potential benefits, no SARM has been fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or equivalent bodies in other countries, as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021. This is due to insufficient clinical data on long-term safety and efficacy. Some SARMs are being investigated in clinical trials, but none have been approved for general use. Consequently, many SARMs available online are often sold as research chemicals, which means they are not regulated, their purity and concentration are not guaranteed, and their long-term effects are largely unknown.

Known and Potential Side Effects of SARMs

Preliminary research and anecdotal reports suggest that some users of SARMs may experience side effects such as changes in mood, hair loss, vision problems, liver damage, and heart disease. For instance, vision problems have been noted specifically with SARMs like S4 (Andarine) and could potentially be due to the metabolites or by-products that form after the body metabolizes these substances. However, comprehensive studies are needed to determine the frequency, severity, and permanency of these side effects.

The Risk of Contamination

Another significant concern with SARMs, particularly those sold online, is the risk of contamination. Some products marketed as SARMs have been found to contain harmful substances, incorrect concentrations, or even entirely different compounds. This can increase the risk of harmful side effects and unknown health risks.

Counterfeit products

Counterfeit products are another significant safety concern. Since the commercial sale of SARMs is not regulated, the market is rife with products of dubious authenticity and quality. Users risk consuming substances that have been inaccurately labelled or contaminated with harmful ingredients. Therefore, without strict regulatory oversight, it’s impossible to ensure that SARMs are safe or effective.

Pro athletes who were suspended for using SARMS

It’s important to note that while several professional athletes have been suspended for using SARMs, privacy laws and organizational rules can sometimes limit the availability of specific details.

  1. James Segeyaro: In 2019, the Australian professional rugby league player tested positive for Ligandrol, a type of SARM. Segeyaro was suspended from the National Rugby League (NRL) as a result of the positive test.
  2. Shayna Jack: The Australian swimmer tested positive for Ligandrol ahead of the 2019 World Championships. Jack was given a two-year ban as a result.
  3. Joakim Noah: The professional basketball player was suspended for 20 games in 2017 by the NBA after testing positive for a SARM.
  4. Will Grier: In 2015, the University of Florida quarterback was suspended for the remainder of the football season after testing positive for a SARM.

Conclusion: Are SARMs Safe?

Given the current state of knowledge, it’s difficult to definitively state whether SARMs are safe. While they show promise in their ability to selectively target muscle and bone tissue, the lack of regulatory approval, potential side effects, and the risks associated with unregulated products are concerning.

More rigorous clinical trials and regulatory oversight are necessary to conclusively determine the safety profile of SARMs. In the meantime, individuals considering the use of SARMs should be aware of the potential risks and ideally, should only do so under the supervision of a healthcare professional.

This article serves as a warning to users that while the potential benefits of SARMs can be enticing, there are real, unknown risks associated with their use. As always, the best course of action is to stay informed and exercise caution when considering any form of supplementation, especially those not approved by regulatory authorities.


Recent News

Editor's Pick